Is 1.85:1 better than 16:9?
Neither is objectively "better" - they're designed for different purposes. Here's how they compare.
The Short Answer:
1.85:1 is better for:
- ✅Theatrical cinema
- ✅Professional film
- ✅Prestige content
- ✅Festival submissions
16:9 is better for:
- ✅Television/broadcast
- ✅Streaming platforms
- ✅Web video
- ✅General purpose video
Detailed Comparison:
| Factor | 1.85:1 | 16:9 |
|---|---|---|
| Primary use | Cinema | TV/Web |
| Cinematic feel | Yes, professional | No, TV standard |
| Theater friendly | Perfect | Not optimized |
| Web friendly | Needs letterboxing | Native web standard |
| Streaming | Works (bars) | Fills screen |
| Equipment | Cinema equipment | Standard cameras |
| Audience expectation | Film/premium | Casual/broadcast |
| Ease of framing | Moderate | Easy |
| Production cost | Higher | Lower |
| Post-production | More complex | Standard |
Why 1.85:1 is Better for Film:
Theatrical Standard:
- Industry expects it
- Theaters optimized for it
- Professional cinema format
- Decades of precedent
- Institutional support
More Cinematic:
- Wider than TV standard
- Feels more professional
- Movie-like quality
- Audience perception
- Premium appearance
Better Than 16:9 for Theaters:
- 16:9 is TV standard
- 1.85:1 fills theater better
- Theater screens optimized for it
- Audience expects it for cinema
- Professional choice
Festival Standard:
- Film festivals expect 1.85:1
- Professional presentation
- Recognized format
- Industry standard
- Awards preference
Why 16:9 is Better for Most:
Universal Standard:
- Every TV is 16:9
- Every monitor is 16:9
- Every phone is 16:9
- No letterboxing needed
- Fills screens naturally
Web Native:
- YouTube is 16:9
- Streaming is 16:9
- Browsers are 16:9
- No black bars
- Maximum screen usage
Practical:
- Standard cameras shoot it
- Easy to edit
- No special equipment
- Simple post-production
- Less technical knowledge needed
Production Friendly:
- Cheaper to produce
- Less equipment needed
- Easier to frame subjects
- Faster workflow
- More forgiving
Broadcasting Standard:
- TV uses 16:9
- Broadcast standard
- Professional TV format
- Industry standard
- Universal acceptance
When 1.85:1 Wins:
Theatrical Release:
1.85:1 is infinitely better
- This is what it's designed for
- Professional cinema standard
- Fills theater screens optimally
- Audience expects it
- Industry standard
Festival Submission:
1.85:1 is the professional choice
- Film festivals expect it
- Professional presentation
- Recognized format
- Shows commitment
- Industry standard
Prestige Streaming:
1.85:1 is more prestigious
- Feels more cinematic
- Premium appearance
- Professional quality
- Netflix/Apple TV+ accept it
- Elevates perception
High-End Production:
1.85:1 is more appropriate
- Professional cinema work
- Studio productions
- High-budget films
- Premium content
- Cinematic aesthetic
When 16:9 Wins:
YouTube Video:
16:9 is infinitely better
- YouTube standard
- Fills the screen
- No letterboxing
- Native format
- No compromise needed
Web Streaming:
16:9 is better
- Universal web standard
- Fills screens
- Simple delivery
- No technical issues
- Audience expectation
Broadcast TV:
16:9 is required
- Television standard
- No alternatives
- Professional broadcast
- Industry standard
- Required format
Social Media:
16:9 is better
- Fills social feeds
- Native format
- Easy sharing
- No black bars
- Viewer preference
The Honest Truth:
For 99% of people: Use 16:9
- It's the standard
- Works everywhere
- No complications
- Universal support
- Practical choice
For theatrical film: Use 1.85:1
- This is what it's designed for
- Professional cinema standard
- Theater optimization
- Industry expectation
- Proper format
Size Difference:
At 1080p height:
- 1.85:1: 1998 × 1080
- 16:9: 1920 × 1080
- Difference: Only 78 pixels (4% wider)
In human terms: Barely noticeable difference!
Decision:
Choose 1.85:1 if:
→ Making theatrical film
→ Festival submission
→ Prestige streaming
→ Professional cinema
Choose 16:9 if:
→ YouTube video
→ Web streaming
→ Social media
→ Broadcast
→ You're unsure
Key Takeaway:
1.85:1 is "better" for theatrical cinema where it's the professional standard. 16:9 is "better" for everything else - web, TV, streaming, and general use. Neither is objectively better; they're optimized for different distribution channels. For most creators, 16:9 is the practical choice.
Related Resources
Ready to Calculate Aspect Ratios?
Use our free aspect ratio calculator to find the perfect dimensions for your project.
Try the Calculator