Video & Cinema • Cinematic Formats
Why use 1.85:1 aspect ratio?
1.85:1 is used in professional cinema for several practical and aesthetic reasons. Here's why filmmakers choose this ratio.
Practical Advantages:
1. Theatrical Standard
- Recognized industry format
- Theaters are equipped for it
- Institutional acceptance
- Professional credibility
- Decades of precedent
2. Better Than 16:9 for Film
- 16:9 is a TV standard
- 1.85:1 feels more cinematic
- Fills theater screens better
- More professional appearance
- Audience expectation
3. Less Extreme Than 2.39:1
- 2.39:1 is very wide
- 1.85:1 is more moderate
- Better for dialogue scenes
- Easier to frame characters
- Less wasted space
4. Easier Composition
- More square than ultra-wide
- Easier to frame subjects
- Better for close-ups
- Works for group shots
- Flexible framing
5. Better for Dialogue
- Characters fit naturally
- Head room is easier
- Two-shots look good
- Three-shots possible
- Conversational scenes work well
Aesthetic Reasons:
Creates Cinematic Feel
- Wider than TV (16:9)
- Professional appearance
- Film-like quality
- Theatrical impression
- Audience perception of quality
Immersive Experience
- Fills more of viewer's vision
- More engaging than 16:9
- Less than 2.39:1 (too wide)
- Sweet spot for cinema
- Better viewer engagement
Versatility
- Works for many genres
- Action films use it
- Drama uses it
- Comedy uses it
- Universal applicability
When Directors Choose 1.85:1:
Action/Adventure:
- Good for wide shots
- Room for movement
- Dynamic compositions
- Fills the screen
Drama/Character Films:
- Better than ultra-wide for faces
- Easier to frame actors
- Maintains intimacy
- Professional standard
Mixed Content:
- Works for everything
- Not too wide, not too narrow
- Flexible for most scenes
- Safe choice
When NOT to Use 1.85:1:
- ❌IMAX/Giant screen (use ultra-wide)
- ❌Streaming-only (use 16:9)
- ❌YouTube-only (16:9 more practical)
- ❌Vertical content (use 9:16)
- ❌Square content (use 1:1)
Historical Context:
Why it developed:
- 1950s: Needed wider than Academy
- Fills theatrical screens
- But not as extreme as cinemascope
- Found its place in standards
- Still used today
Professional Benefits:
For Production:
- ✅Industry-recognized
- ✅Equipment available
- ✅Rental houses stock lenses
- ✅Post-production supports it
- ✅Theaters can show it
For Distribution:
- ✅Theaters accept it
- ✅Easy to distribute
- ✅Known format
- ✅Professional appearance
- ✅Audience expects it in cinema
For Audience:
- ✅Feels cinematic
- ✅Fills theater screens
- ✅More engaging than 16:9
- ✅Professional quality perception
- ✅Expected for theatrical release
Comparison: Why 1.85:1 vs Alternatives
vs 16:9:
- 1.85:1 feels more cinematic
- Better for theatrical release
- More professional appearance
- Fills screen better
- More immersive
vs 2.39:1:
- 1.85:1 easier to frame
- Better for dialogue/close-ups
- Less extreme
- Practical for all genres
- Less letterboxing on streaming
vs Academy (1.37:1):
- 1.85:1 much wider
- Better for modern tastes
- Fills modern screens
- More cinematic
- Contemporary standard
Key Takeaway:
Use 1.85:1 when making professional theatrical content. It's the industry standard that feels cinematic, fills theater screens better than 16:9, but is more practical for diverse scenes than ultra-wide 2.39:1. It's the professional's choice for films meant for theater exhibition.
Related Resources
Ready to Calculate Aspect Ratios?
Use our free aspect ratio calculator to find the perfect dimensions for your project.
Try the Calculator