What is 3:2 aspect ratio?
3:2 is an aspect ratio widely used in photography, especially in 35mm film cameras and many modern digital cameras. It represents a rectangle that's 3 units wide by 2 units tall, creating a shape that's 1.5 times wider than it is tall.
Understanding 3:2:
Ratio: 3:2
Decimal: 1.5:1 (3 ÷ 2 = 1.5)
Shape: Slightly wider rectangle, natural for many subjects
Origin: 35mm film (36mm x 24mm)
Why 3:2 Exists:
The 3:2 ratio originated from 35mm film, which has been the photography standard since the 1920s. The physical film frame measured 36mm wide by 24mm tall, creating a natural 3:2 proportion.
When digital cameras emerged, many manufacturers kept the 3:2 ratio because:
- Photographers were accustomed to it
- Proven compositional format
- Heritage and tradition
- Works well for various subjects
Common 3:2 Resolutions:
Digital Cameras:
- 6000 x 4000 (24 megapixels)
- 7360 x 4912 (36 megapixels)
- 8192 x 5464 (45 megapixels)
- 9504 x 6336 (60 megapixels)
Print Sizes:
- 4" x 6"
- 6" x 9"
- 8" x 12"
- 12" x 18"
- 16" x 24"
- 20" x 30"
Common Screen Sizes:
- 3000 x 2000 (many tablets)
- 2160 x 1440 (some laptops)
Where 3:2 Is Used:
Camera Systems:
- Canon DSLRs and mirrorless: EOS R series, 5D, 6D, etc.
- Nikon DSLRs and mirrorless: Z series, D850, D780, etc.
- Sony full-frame: A7 series, A9 series
- Leica: M series, SL series
- Fujifilm: Some X-series cameras
Devices:
- Microsoft Surface tablets (3:2 screens)
- Some premium laptops
- Photo frames
- Print standard sizes
Why Photographers Like 3:2:
- ✅Versatile Composition: Works for portraits and landscapes
- ✅Natural Crop: Easy to crop to other ratios
- ✅Print Friendly: Standard photo print sizes are 3:2
- ✅Historical Standard: Decades of photographic tradition
- ✅Balanced Shape: Not too wide, not too square
- ✅Portrait Orientation: Good vertical format
3:2 vs. Other Aspect Ratios:
3:2 vs. 4:3 (Micro Four Thirds, some cameras):
- 3:2 is slightly wider (1.5:1 vs 1.33:1)
- 3:2 feels more "photographic"
- 4:3 is more square, better for some portraits
- 4:3 common in older digital cameras
3:2 vs. 16:9 (video standard):
- 3:2 is taller (1.5:1 vs 1.78:1)
- 16:9 is much wider, cinematic
- 3:2 better for portraits
- 16:9 better for landscapes and video
3:2 vs. 1:1 (square, Instagram):
- 3:2 is rectangular
- 1:1 is square
- 1:1 forces center composition
- 3:2 allows more directional composition
3:2 vs. 4:5 (portrait photography, Instagram):
- 3:2 is wider in landscape orientation
- 4:5 is taller, better for vertical portraits
- 4:5 popular on social media
- 3:2 more traditional
Compositional Advantages:
Landscape Photography:
- Good width for horizons
- Room for sky and foreground
- Not overly wide (like 16:9)
- Natural perspective
Portrait Photography:
- Excellent vertical format
- Room for head to toe shots
- Classic portrait proportions
- Easy to print
Street Photography:
- Versatile for unpredictable scenes
- Quick framing
- Traditional photojournalism ratio
- Works for horizontal and vertical
Architecture:
- Good for buildings
- Balances width and height
- Not too compressed
- Room for context
Cropping From 3:2:
To 16:9 (for video/screens):
- Crop top and bottom
- Lose about 17% of height
- Creates cinematic look
- Good for panoramic scenes
To 4:3:
- Crop sides
- Lose about 11% of width
- More square composition
- Better for some displays
To 1:1 (square):
- Crop sides or top/bottom
- Lose 33% of longer dimension
- Instagram-friendly
- Forces different composition
To 4:5 (Instagram portrait):
- Crop width significantly
- Focus on vertical subject
- Modern social media look
- Lose horizontal context
Print Considerations:
Perfect Prints (no cropping):
- 4x6"
- 6x9"
- 8x12"
- 12x18"
- 16x24"
- 20x30"
Problematic Prints (requires cropping or borders):
- 5x7" (different ratio)
- 8x10" (different ratio)
- 11x14" (different ratio)
When printing 3:2 images to non-3:2 paper:
- Crop to fit (lose content)
- White borders (keep all content)
- Slight distortion (don't do this!)
Digital Display:
Good for 3:2:
- Microsoft Surface devices
- Some premium laptops
- Digital photo frames designed for 3:2
- Vertical phone viewing (portrait photos)
Issues with 3:2:
- 16:9 TVs: Black bars on sides (portrait) or top/bottom (landscape)
- 4:3 screens: Small black bars
- Ultrawide monitors: Significant black bars
Camera Sensor Formats Using 3:2:
Full Frame (35mm equivalent):
- 36mm x 24mm sensor
- Most professional cameras
- Canon, Nikon, Sony, Leica
APS-C (crop sensor):
- ~23.6mm x 15.7mm (Canon)
- ~23.5mm x 15.6mm (Nikon/Sony)
- Many enthusiast cameras
35mm Film:
- Original 3:2 format
- 36mm x 24mm frame
- Scan to digital at 3:2
When to Shoot 3:2:
- ✅Planning to Print: Standard sizes match perfectly
- ✅Traditional Photography: Classic photographic look
- ✅Mixed Subjects: Don't know if landscape or portrait
- ✅Client Work: Professional standard
- ✅Maximum Flexibility: Easy to crop to other ratios later
When NOT to Shoot 3:2:
- ❌Social Media Only: 4:5 or 1:1 might be better
- ❌Video Integration: 16:9 preferred
- ❌Web Display: 16:9 or 4:3 might work better
- ❌Specific Platform: Match platform requirements
Professional Use:
Wedding Photography:
- Albums often designed for 3:2
- Classic, timeless look
- Easy printing
- Traditional format
Portrait Studios:
- Standard for headshots
- Professional expectation
- Print-ready format
- Client familiarity
Photojournalism:
- Historical standard
- Quick composition
- Versatile for news
- Works for publication
Fine Art:
- Artistic tradition
- Gallery-friendly
- Printable at standard sizes
- Professional appearance
Modern Alternatives:
4:5 (0.8:1):
- Instagram portrait standard
- Taller than 3:2
- Social media optimized
- Modern look
16:9 (1.78:1):
- Video standard
- Wider than 3:2
- Screen-friendly
- Cinematic
1:1 (Square):
- Instagram classic
- Unique composition
- No orientation issues
- Distinctive look
The Future of 3:2:
3:2 will remain relevant because:
- Established print standards
- Camera manufacturer tradition
- Professional expectation
- Versatile for many uses
- Easy to work with
However, competition from other ratios:
- 4:5 gaining popularity (social media)
- 16:9 for video integration
- 1:1 for Instagram aesthetic
Tips for Working with 3:2:
Composition:
- Use rule of thirds effectively
- Plan for potential crops
- Leave breathing room
- Consider both orientations
Editing:
- Shoot slightly wider than needed
- Allows cropping to 16:9, 4:5, etc.
- Don't compose too tight
- Think about final use
Printing:
- Stick to 3:2 print sizes
- Or embrace white borders
- Don't crop important elements
- Consider mat boarding
Workflow:
- Import at full 3:2
- Crop for specific uses later
- Keep master files at 3:2
- Export variations as needed
Use our aspect ratio calculator to find perfect 3:2 dimensions for your photography projects, or explore our video calculator to see how 3:2 compares to other ratios.
Related Resources
Ready to Calculate Aspect Ratios?
Use our free aspect ratio calculator to find the perfect dimensions for your project.
Try the Calculator