Photography

What is 3:2 aspect ratio?

3:2 is an aspect ratio widely used in photography, especially in 35mm film cameras and many modern digital cameras. It represents a rectangle that's 3 units wide by 2 units tall, creating a shape that's 1.5 times wider than it is tall.

Understanding 3:2:

Ratio: 3:2

Decimal: 1.5:1 (3 ÷ 2 = 1.5)

Shape: Slightly wider rectangle, natural for many subjects

Origin: 35mm film (36mm x 24mm)

Why 3:2 Exists:

The 3:2 ratio originated from 35mm film, which has been the photography standard since the 1920s. The physical film frame measured 36mm wide by 24mm tall, creating a natural 3:2 proportion.

When digital cameras emerged, many manufacturers kept the 3:2 ratio because:

  • Photographers were accustomed to it
  • Proven compositional format
  • Heritage and tradition
  • Works well for various subjects

Common 3:2 Resolutions:

Digital Cameras:

  • 6000 x 4000 (24 megapixels)
  • 7360 x 4912 (36 megapixels)
  • 8192 x 5464 (45 megapixels)
  • 9504 x 6336 (60 megapixels)

Print Sizes:

  • 4" x 6"
  • 6" x 9"
  • 8" x 12"
  • 12" x 18"
  • 16" x 24"
  • 20" x 30"

Common Screen Sizes:

  • 3000 x 2000 (many tablets)
  • 2160 x 1440 (some laptops)

Where 3:2 Is Used:

Camera Systems:

  • Canon DSLRs and mirrorless: EOS R series, 5D, 6D, etc.
  • Nikon DSLRs and mirrorless: Z series, D850, D780, etc.
  • Sony full-frame: A7 series, A9 series
  • Leica: M series, SL series
  • Fujifilm: Some X-series cameras

Devices:

  • Microsoft Surface tablets (3:2 screens)
  • Some premium laptops
  • Photo frames
  • Print standard sizes

Why Photographers Like 3:2:

  • Versatile Composition: Works for portraits and landscapes
  • Natural Crop: Easy to crop to other ratios
  • Print Friendly: Standard photo print sizes are 3:2
  • Historical Standard: Decades of photographic tradition
  • Balanced Shape: Not too wide, not too square
  • Portrait Orientation: Good vertical format

3:2 vs. Other Aspect Ratios:

3:2 vs. 4:3 (Micro Four Thirds, some cameras):

  • 3:2 is slightly wider (1.5:1 vs 1.33:1)
  • 3:2 feels more "photographic"
  • 4:3 is more square, better for some portraits
  • 4:3 common in older digital cameras

3:2 vs. 16:9 (video standard):

  • 3:2 is taller (1.5:1 vs 1.78:1)
  • 16:9 is much wider, cinematic
  • 3:2 better for portraits
  • 16:9 better for landscapes and video

3:2 vs. 1:1 (square, Instagram):

  • 3:2 is rectangular
  • 1:1 is square
  • 1:1 forces center composition
  • 3:2 allows more directional composition

3:2 vs. 4:5 (portrait photography, Instagram):

  • 3:2 is wider in landscape orientation
  • 4:5 is taller, better for vertical portraits
  • 4:5 popular on social media
  • 3:2 more traditional

Compositional Advantages:

Landscape Photography:

  • Good width for horizons
  • Room for sky and foreground
  • Not overly wide (like 16:9)
  • Natural perspective

Portrait Photography:

  • Excellent vertical format
  • Room for head to toe shots
  • Classic portrait proportions
  • Easy to print

Street Photography:

  • Versatile for unpredictable scenes
  • Quick framing
  • Traditional photojournalism ratio
  • Works for horizontal and vertical

Architecture:

  • Good for buildings
  • Balances width and height
  • Not too compressed
  • Room for context

Cropping From 3:2:

To 16:9 (for video/screens):

  • Crop top and bottom
  • Lose about 17% of height
  • Creates cinematic look
  • Good for panoramic scenes

To 4:3:

  • Crop sides
  • Lose about 11% of width
  • More square composition
  • Better for some displays

To 1:1 (square):

  • Crop sides or top/bottom
  • Lose 33% of longer dimension
  • Instagram-friendly
  • Forces different composition

To 4:5 (Instagram portrait):

  • Crop width significantly
  • Focus on vertical subject
  • Modern social media look
  • Lose horizontal context

Print Considerations:

Perfect Prints (no cropping):

  • 4x6"
  • 6x9"
  • 8x12"
  • 12x18"
  • 16x24"
  • 20x30"

Problematic Prints (requires cropping or borders):

  • 5x7" (different ratio)
  • 8x10" (different ratio)
  • 11x14" (different ratio)

When printing 3:2 images to non-3:2 paper:

  • Crop to fit (lose content)
  • White borders (keep all content)
  • Slight distortion (don't do this!)

Digital Display:

Good for 3:2:

  • Microsoft Surface devices
  • Some premium laptops
  • Digital photo frames designed for 3:2
  • Vertical phone viewing (portrait photos)

Issues with 3:2:

  • 16:9 TVs: Black bars on sides (portrait) or top/bottom (landscape)
  • 4:3 screens: Small black bars
  • Ultrawide monitors: Significant black bars

Camera Sensor Formats Using 3:2:

Full Frame (35mm equivalent):

  • 36mm x 24mm sensor
  • Most professional cameras
  • Canon, Nikon, Sony, Leica

APS-C (crop sensor):

  • ~23.6mm x 15.7mm (Canon)
  • ~23.5mm x 15.6mm (Nikon/Sony)
  • Many enthusiast cameras

35mm Film:

  • Original 3:2 format
  • 36mm x 24mm frame
  • Scan to digital at 3:2

When to Shoot 3:2:

  • Planning to Print: Standard sizes match perfectly
  • Traditional Photography: Classic photographic look
  • Mixed Subjects: Don't know if landscape or portrait
  • Client Work: Professional standard
  • Maximum Flexibility: Easy to crop to other ratios later

When NOT to Shoot 3:2:

  • Social Media Only: 4:5 or 1:1 might be better
  • Video Integration: 16:9 preferred
  • Web Display: 16:9 or 4:3 might work better
  • Specific Platform: Match platform requirements

Professional Use:

Wedding Photography:

  • Albums often designed for 3:2
  • Classic, timeless look
  • Easy printing
  • Traditional format

Portrait Studios:

  • Standard for headshots
  • Professional expectation
  • Print-ready format
  • Client familiarity

Photojournalism:

  • Historical standard
  • Quick composition
  • Versatile for news
  • Works for publication

Fine Art:

  • Artistic tradition
  • Gallery-friendly
  • Printable at standard sizes
  • Professional appearance

Modern Alternatives:

4:5 (0.8:1):

  • Instagram portrait standard
  • Taller than 3:2
  • Social media optimized
  • Modern look

16:9 (1.78:1):

  • Video standard
  • Wider than 3:2
  • Screen-friendly
  • Cinematic

1:1 (Square):

  • Instagram classic
  • Unique composition
  • No orientation issues
  • Distinctive look

The Future of 3:2:

3:2 will remain relevant because:

  • Established print standards
  • Camera manufacturer tradition
  • Professional expectation
  • Versatile for many uses
  • Easy to work with

However, competition from other ratios:

  • 4:5 gaining popularity (social media)
  • 16:9 for video integration
  • 1:1 for Instagram aesthetic

Tips for Working with 3:2:

Composition:

  • Use rule of thirds effectively
  • Plan for potential crops
  • Leave breathing room
  • Consider both orientations

Editing:

  • Shoot slightly wider than needed
  • Allows cropping to 16:9, 4:5, etc.
  • Don't compose too tight
  • Think about final use

Printing:

  • Stick to 3:2 print sizes
  • Or embrace white borders
  • Don't crop important elements
  • Consider mat boarding

Workflow:

  • Import at full 3:2
  • Crop for specific uses later
  • Keep master files at 3:2
  • Export variations as needed

Use our aspect ratio calculator to find perfect 3:2 dimensions for your photography projects, or explore our video calculator to see how 3:2 compares to other ratios.

Ready to Calculate Aspect Ratios?

Use our free aspect ratio calculator to find the perfect dimensions for your project.

Try the Calculator